Search
Reach Agreement

Extra Eagle is the company behind Agree2 where you can create, negotiate and sign agreements.

Navigation
Wednesday
Jan272010

Getting the agreement done is now even faster and easier

One of the most exhilarating times is when you are bringing in a new client, a new business partner or supplier. But the practical tasks involved are annoying and tedious. Preparing that word template, emailing, fedexing, printing, faxing are all annoyances we just want to get rid of.

Agree2 has always been about getting rid of these annoying steps. They really feel like they should have been left in the 1980s together with our snow wash jeans. While we were clearly better than the alternative, our own multi-step process still felt like it could be improved.

So we went back to the drawing board and completely redesigned the way you create agreements in Agree2.

As you can see this process is now unbelievably fast. However you are still free to manually invite parties to the agreement as you would before.

It’s helping me personally. While I am not a big fan of NDA’s they are necessary every now and again. Just this morning I had to create a NDA for a potential partner while we were chatting on Skype. I picked Lex Publica’s great new Mutual Confidentiality Agreement and by the time I told him to check his mail I received an email from Agree2 saying he had accepted it. In less than a minute I had created the agreement and both of us had signed it and our now confidential chat continued.

Tuesday
Jan052010

LexPublica on Agree2

LexPublica is a fantastic new initiative to create a set of standard open source contract templates that anyone can use.

No one can afford lawyers. Individuals, professionals and small businesses can’t afford lawyers. Startups can’t afford lawyers. Big companies with large budgets for legal services struggle to afford lawyers. Even lawyers complain, genuinely, that they can’t afford lawyers.

Zak Greant from LexPublica was nice enough to add their Mutual Confidentiality Agreement to Agree2 and we will be adding the rest shortly.

One really nice thing about their templates is that they have been written and vetted by a community of lawyers and also come with good instructions similar to what you should be receiving from a lawyer. See these guidelines for the Simple Mutual Confidentiality Agreement

If you do need to create an NDA in the future please do consider using theirs.

Tuesday
Dec012009

Attachments and better agreement invitations

Several of our users have asked us for the possibility of attaching files to an agreement. This is a little more complicated a request than you might think due to our approach of recording evidence during the life time of the agreement, but I think we came up with a good simple way of handling it.

You can only attach and remove files during drafting. This is to ensure that no changes are made to the attachments afterwards.

But first of all how does it work?

You will find the “Attach file” button just below the “Add party” button.

Now just pick your file add a description and hit “Attach file”

Now it is available at the bottom of your agreement:

So far it’s just like any other file attachment.

Where is the evidence?

Agree2 provides an Evidence Browser that all parties investigate the full audit trail of the agreement. Click on your agreements “Tools” button and then the “View evidence” button:

What we actually do though is record an event in the agreements evidence browser every time the attachment is created and deleted as well as the first time it is viewed. This together with all the other evidence we store in the evidence browser should provide everything you need to prove what went on with the email. Try that in email?

Here you can see I deleted the attachment and added a new one:

Attachments is available on our Small plan and above. This runs at only $12/month and also allows multiple account users so it’s ideal for a small business. Click on the “Account” link at the very top of the page to upgrade your plan.

Better invitation

When inviting someone to an agreement, they would previously get one email that you could not reply to. We have split the invitation into two parts, so that there are now two emails. One email contains the text of the agreement. As an Agree2 customer who invites someone to an agreement, you will now appear as the sender of this email, so that invited parties can now respond directly to you, simply by replying to that email.

For security reasons, the private link to the agreement is sent in a second, seperate email.

We hope that these changes provide a better experience for your customers/clients/partners.

Tuesday
Aug252009

Case study: 3dbyggeri use Agree2 for all their deals

3dbyggeri danmark logo We talked to Jeppe Liisberg from the Danish company 3dbyggeri danmark about how they use Agree2 in their business: Jeppe Liisberg, Consultant, Engineer, and IT at 3d byggeri Danmark

What does your company do?

Consultancy and handling of digital product information for building material manufacturers in Denmark.

Why do you use Agree2?

We want to be effective, and at the same time signal that we are young and innovative.

What do you like about Agree2?

No paper, no snailmail, no physical archives, no fuzz.

Can you tell us about a case where you have used Agree2?

We sign all our deals via Agree2. License agreements, consultancy contrakts, NDA’s etc. And it’s working well even for low tech people.

What did you do before using Agree2?

I don’t want to think about it!


Friday
Mar132009

Even signatures by blood don't necessarily count

I’ve been preaching for a long time that the signature is not the most important thing in a contract. Here is a recent real example:

The (new) legal Writer has been following this story Gratuitous contract not enforceable, even when written in blood

Basically while drunk Mr. Son while drunk signed a contract in blood with Mr. Kim that said:

“Sir, forgive me. Because of my deeds, you have suffered financially. I will repay you to the best of my ability.”

Mr. Kim took Mr. Son to court about this and the court found that this was not a contract due to lack of consideration. Follow “”Gratuitous contract not enforceable, even when written in blood”:http://raymondpward.typepad.com/newlegalwriter/2009/03/gratuitous-contract-not-enforceable-even-when-written-in-blood.html for the full back story.

Consideration is the legal concept that roughly says that a contract has to be an exchange. It can not be one sided. In the above “contract” Mr. Kim didn’t offer anything in exchange. So it is not a contract and completely invalid no matter how cool the signature was.

You can think of consideration as an early an effective consumer protection scheme. To read more about how contracts work and why it really is far more important to worry about them than the actual signature check out the following two articles I wrote:

Remember though if you sign over your soul to the devil in blood in return for winning the next American Idol that would be Consideration and therefore a valid contract.

Also I would add using Agree2 to draft, negotiate and sign your contracts would be a lot fairer, cleaner and safer than using blood.